<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Has the Internet changed our attitudes about sex?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sexyoldbroad.com/has-the-internet-changed-our-attitudes-about-sex/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sexyoldbroad.com/has-the-internet-changed-our-attitudes-about-sex</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:39:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cole</title>
		<link>http://www.sexyoldbroad.com/has-the-internet-changed-our-attitudes-about-sex/comment-page-1#comment-10074</link>
		<dc:creator>cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sexyoldbroad.com/?p=426#comment-10074</guid>
		<description>I think the internet has given women a chance to find porn they like in a more comfortable setting than your sleazy XXX store. And it&#039;s even allowed consumers to better connect with people making porn. Woman-friendly porn seems to have blossomed since the advent of the internet; although, I&#039;m no expert so this could simply be a coincidence.

Interesting survey, although some of the questions are obviously flawed. 

As in the one about views in fidelity. Why is there no &quot;yes&quot; and what do the options besides &quot;no&quot; even mean? Plus, it doesn&#039;t taken into account if folks were already not concerned or loosely defining fidelity.

And flirting in the internet? The question cannot be answered without defining flirting? Harmless comments that are not personal? No harm in that in almost any setting but I suspect the intent was to have us assume something more serious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the internet has given women a chance to find porn they like in a more comfortable setting than your sleazy XXX store. And it&#8217;s even allowed consumers to better connect with people making porn. Woman-friendly porn seems to have blossomed since the advent of the internet; although, I&#8217;m no expert so this could simply be a coincidence.</p>
<p>Interesting survey, although some of the questions are obviously flawed. </p>
<p>As in the one about views in fidelity. Why is there no &#8220;yes&#8221; and what do the options besides &#8220;no&#8221; even mean? Plus, it doesn&#8217;t taken into account if folks were already not concerned or loosely defining fidelity.</p>
<p>And flirting in the internet? The question cannot be answered without defining flirting? Harmless comments that are not personal? No harm in that in almost any setting but I suspect the intent was to have us assume something more serious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric "Speedcat Hollydale"</title>
		<link>http://www.sexyoldbroad.com/has-the-internet-changed-our-attitudes-about-sex/comment-page-1#comment-10043</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric "Speedcat Hollydale"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 05:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sexyoldbroad.com/?p=426#comment-10043</guid>
		<description>Internet flirting???

Ohhh no, I would never do that ;-)
SMOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOTCH</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Internet flirting???</p>
<p>Ohhh no, I would never do that <img src='http://www.sexyoldbroad.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
SMOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOTCH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
